Socio-Economic Change Impact After the Closure of Mining Activities . A Case Study of Aravalli Hills of Faridabad District , Haryana

Introduction Beginning of mining and its termination contributes towards both positive and negative effect the socioeconomic status of the people living in the mining areas and its surroundings. The positive contribution noticed in the form of increasing income source, job creation/increasing employment, migration, community formation, population growth and maintenance of social activities. While the negative Abstract Mining activities in Aravali hills had played a vital role in industrial growth of the Haryana state but these are also responsible to affect the environment and social life of the community located nearby the area. Present study carried out through special questionnaire consisting of selective parameters such as type of houses, source of water, sanitary facilities, source of income, source of energy, asset, communication services and educational status etc. This elicited from 326 residents of surrounding villages of mining areas situated in Aravalli hills explaining the socio-economic status of the local people after the closure of mining activities for 13 years. The finding shows both positive and negative impact of closure of mining activities. The positive impacts found as reduction in environmental degradation, health and education improvement, while the negative impact observed on income stability, employment, migration etc. Taking into consideration these impacts, government and regional organizations should take possible steps to overcome this major problem of the district. Article History

and air and water pollution 13 .The most noticeable impacts on the ecosystem are degradation of land, deforestation, displacement of wildlife, effects on aquatic ecosystem, loss of habitat for biodiversity including rare flora and fauna.Kitula (2006)  12 studied the socio-economic and environment impacts of mining in Geita District, Tanzania.These impacts included land degradation, damage to water quality, pollution, and harm to livestock and wildlife biodiversity.Behera (2015)  2 reported that due to mining activity the stream water is contaminated, the agriculture field's fertility is affected.Maconachie (2007)  21 investigated that the economic, social, cultural, health and environmental impacts of medium and large-scale mining operations on local communities.The lack of effective or adequate employee training 3 compounds the negative impacts of closure, including inadequate job creation.Unemployment, loss of social services and amenities, pollution, disturbance of the landscape, the loss of land utility and increased risks to health and safety 1,18 .Researchers 11,19 reported that the mining ban has affected the economic life of most of the Goans, people are unemployed and cannot get an alternate job.lad et al (2009)  16 stated that when the mines close all the economic opportunities cease which leads to disruption of the economic base of the communities.The society living near mining industry is at higher risk of facing adverse effects of unplanned mine closure in near future 7,25,27 .Sarkar et al (1996)  26 illustrated abandoned mine sits after the closure of mining activities continue to pose potential threat to human safety, health and environment.limpitlaw (2004) 17 stated that mine site closure planning should occur within the initial mine site operations.Various literature indicates that improved mine closure and mine site rehabilitation planning are best mining procedures, identifies mining for closure as a sustainability issue, and is no longer simple an environmental issue 23 .The socio-economic impact of closure of mining activities are the issue that is captured in the mine legislation, however are increasingly including in the mine closure procedures and plans of leading mining companies 4,8,9,10,22 .Change in Social and economic variables are the two major aspects that concertize this survey.This study represents the socio-economic status just during the mining activities and after the closure of mining activities.This study provides new insights because generally economy heavily depends upon mining activities and it decline after the closure of mining activities.

Methodology
The field survey of the study has been done in october to December 2015 in and around the villages of the mining area.The data of the study has been divided into two categories i.e Primary and Secondary data.Primary data are collected through questionnaire interviews, focus group discussion (FGDs), and other participatory approach.Primary data are raw data while secondary data are already processed data presents in unpublished reports, publications and stored in the forms of soft or hard copy.This study is strictly follows a primary data based on specific questionnaire.Data from 326 samples (242 in the Aravalli hills and 84 around Aravalli hills) collected based on framed questionnaires on the idea to compare socio-economic impact in two different conditions.The survey frame follows the study, which is preparatory and descriptive in nature, and the data are strictly collected from the selected samples.The conducted samples survey covers about 84 households (out of 1694) around Aravalli hills and 242 households (out of 4882) from different villages in Aravalli hills.

Socio-economic change detection analysis of the households
In this section, household status is analysed based on following parameters, namely demographic features, housing particulars, income and expenditure particulars to assess common property resources, basic infrastructure and basic facilities to the mining people provided by mining owner or government are presented here.Analysis was carried out on the possible facts of mining on the financial capital (household income), physical capital (land, house and other physical asset), human capital (health and literacy), social capital (displacement and social network) and shown in Table nos. 1 to 13.In Table 1, the details of the villages and population are given and Table 2 provides the number of males and females surveyed in and around Aravalli hills.

Employment Change
Mining industry not only creates mining jobs but also generates employment indirectly by stimulating demand for goods and services.Mine spends thousands of rupees on equipment, maintenance, food and other services and often use local contractors and suppliers.This creates jobs indirectly in processing of mined material, transportation, and providing equipment and services to the mining industries.The analysis of economic activities of the people reveals that the agriculture is still the most This reveals that the people got benefits from mining activities but presently an average person earns 5000-10,000 per month by doing labour or some other works.After the closure of mining activities, they do not have good occupation.

Expenditure Status
In the villages, most of the household spend a large part of their income on food, and less on non-food items.As the income increases expenditure also

Water Facilities
The sample household data on the wells situated in and around the mining areas, shows that the large number of the people i.e.74.34 % in 2002 in villages of Aravalli hills, depends on bore well, which is reduced to 54.02 % in 2015 (Table 9).However, now people use tube wells increased from 25.66 % in to 45.98% in 2015.A large extractions from groundwater has resulted in increasing the depth to water level which has been observed in many studies in northwest India and Indo-gangetic basin 3,14,15,20,24 .

Housing types
House variable is consisting of three different types of houses i.e Pucca houses, mixed houses and Kutcha houses ( According to respondent interviewed mining activities, produce a good source of income to the people.A large number of the people willing to do mining related work in the mining industries if a job will offer to them irrespective of their educational qualification.From the survey it is highlighted that less number of the respondents hardly have, their higher degree even does not have matriculation degree, which indicates that educational qualification is not only the prerequisite for the people to start mining activities.

3.
As per survey, respondent wish to work in the mining companies again rather than their own business because mining companies make good relationship with their workers by offered them good income with necessary facilities.4.
As the mining provided a lots of opportunities to the local people consequently majority of the people have been affected by the closure of mining activities as it created unemployment among the people and still people do not get suitable job for their daily expenditure.

5.
In order to overcome the financial trouble the government had offered some financial facilities to the affected people but from the survey it is opened that very few people availed these facilities and those who availed the facilities they were not satisfied with the money.6.
Research survey indicated that banning on mining sites has affected the economic status of the local people.A large number of people are presently unemployed because they do not have good jobs due to lower educational qualification and less job opportunities in the areas.People who have invested huge amount of money in the mining business on finance have faced instalment burden.These people are mostly truck and barges owners.They are continuing their life with the belief that someday mining will begin again.7.
The ban of mining resulted in the huge changes in the demographic status, migration of people in the search of job have been increase and some of them leaves villages under mining area for better job opportunities.8.
Mining is an important economic activity in Aravalli zone provides direct or indirect employment facilities such as transport, medical, educational facilities and welfare amenities to the worker.Now, government should take some positive step for the welfare of the affected people.They should start up mining again if possible or arranged some alternative source of income with all basic facilities even after the closure of mine so they would maintained their healthy life.9.
After the closure mine, mining sites should be reused as recreational land, visitor attractions, creative gardens and lakes with the collaboration of mining companies, investors, and land use planners etc. to enhance the job opportunities for the local people.10.
Mining must be environmentally sustainable by innovative methods that decrease the environmental impact caused by mining activities.These methods include parameters such as decreasing water and energy utilization, minimizing land mismanagement, water and air pollution at mine sites and maintaining prosperous mine closure and reclamation activities.
Study area shown in fig. 1 is Faridabad district of Haryana lies between the latitudes 27 o 51' 15" and 28 o 30' 52" North and the longitudes 77 o 04' 39" and 77 o 35' 50" East covering an area 273 km 2 and is represented in the survey of India topographical sheet No: 53H/3 and 53H/7on the scale of 1:50,000.The Aravalli hills are taken as the main centre of the study area, which is, located about 10-12 km from the Faridabad city.Mining in the Aravalli range provides open cast mining of Silica, Quartzite, Badarpur sand and other good quality construction materials, which is basic need of construction activities.During mining activities, it provided livelihood to a large section of society living in and around the villages of mining areas.

Fig. 1 :
Fig. 1: location map of the study area

table 2 : Demographic Features of sample Households both in values and in percentage
N is a number of people surveyed.

Table 4 )
. It is also observed that the less number of people are matriculate and graduate.It is due the reason of lack of necessary literacy skill, awareness and also facilities in school.other factors responsible are illiteracy of parents and distant locations of school or colleges.

table 3 : Socio-Economic change detection of the respondents in 2015 and 2002 variable villages in Aravalli Hills villages around Aravalli Hills 2002 2015 Difference 2002 2015 Difference
India is an agrarian economy mostly dominated by the small and marginal farmers.landholding is one of the most important activity among people.However, survey of the study depicts (Table5) that the number of the people in Aravalli villages who have 2-5 acres are 47.23 % in 2002 which decreased to 30.89% in(2015)indicating that during mining activities people have more income and had more land.

table 6 : Surveyed on Monthly income in 2002 and 2015
i.e. above Rs.15000(Table6) which is decreased to 17.45 % in 2015 (after the closure of mining activities).