• google scholor
  • Views: 2490

  • PDF Downloads: 314

Physco-chemical characteristics of underground drinking water From Bhusawal City (M.S.) India

R.P. Phalak1 * , G.P. Waghulde1 , R.B. Dhake1 , Y.M. Patil1 and D.S.Rane 1

1 Department of Chemistry, D.D.N Bhole College, Bhusawal, 425 201 India

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.1.1.12

Underground water pumped from the borewells is one of the main source fo drinking water in Busawal City. Improper and open drainage system may cause percolation of undesirable materials anc contaminate the underground water. The undergournd water samples were collected from 12 different location near stagnant sewage water of Bhusawal city and the physico-chemical characteristics such as temperature pH, TDS. Total hardness, Ca++ , Mg++ Chlorides, Conductivity, Do.CO2COD of the samples were analysed. The pH of water at Gajanan nagar, Sahakar Nagar and New RMS Colony was towards higher side but was within the normal limits TDS value of water was highest at Timber Market with high Chlorides and COD. Conductivity of water was maximum at V.M.Ward Calcium value were above ISI levels at Kandari,New RMS colony, Swamisamarth, Anand nagar and Mohi nagar but magnesium levels at all sites were within the normal range.


Underground Water Quality; Bhuswal; Drinking Water

Copy the following to cite this article:

Phalak R.P, Waghulde G.P, Dhake R.B, Patil Y.M, Rane D.S. Physco-chemical characteristics of underground drinking water From Bhusawal City (M.S.) India. Curr World Environ 2006;1(1):65-68 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.1.1.12

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Phalak R.P, Waghulde G.P, Dhake R.B, Patil Y.M, Rane D.S. Physco-chemical characteristics of underground drinking water From Bhusawal City (M.S.) India. Curr World Environ 2006;1(1):65-68. Available from: http://www.cwejournal.org/?p=525


Download article (pdf)
Citation Manager
Publish History


Article Publishing History

Received: 2006-03-25
Accepted: 2006-05-21

Introduction

Water is the most essential commodity for the survial of life. Earth is regarded as a water planet having about 71% of its suface area covered by water 97.3 percent of worlds water is found in oceans and is salty that cannot be used for agriculture, domestics and industrial purpose. Out of 2.7% fresh water 2.1 percent freshwater is trapped in the polar ice while in the forms of streams, lakes and underground water it is only 0.6 percent. The ground water which occurs upt the depth of 80 meters below the ground surface is predicted to be 8.5 × 1015 m3 (Bolenback, 1983; Kataria 1994) According to Shiklomanov (2000) only 0.26 percent of total amount of freshwater on the earth is concentrated in lakes, reservoirs and rivers. In india only 4% of worlds freshwater reserves are available but its population is 16 percent to that of world (Ranjit Kumar et al., 2003).

Bhusawal town is located in Khandesh region of Maharashtra having the population about 2.5 lakh and the main source of drinking water is Municipal supply and underground water. As a main Railwary junction and improper open drainage system, sewage water accumulates at different areas. As this water can percolate and contaiminate the underground water, we for the first time have carried out the work to study the potability of underground water from different areas of Bhusawal city.


Material and Methods

File liters each of underground borewell water samples form 12 different sampling stations was collected in polyethylene cans and were analysed for total hardness, chlorides, calcium and magnesium, dissolved CO2 dissolved O2 conductivity, TDS contents and COD by the methods as given by APHA (1992).The PH and temperature ofthe water was measured at the side of collection and at the same time oxygen was fixed in BOD bottles.

Table - 1: Physico-chemical parameters of borewell water from different locations of Bhusawal city

S. No. Sampling Stations Temp °C pH Total dissolved solids Total hardness Calcium Magnesium Chlorides Conductivity µ mho/vm D.O. CO2 COD
1 Gajanan nagar 28.1 8.01 1520 108 59.31 12.5 171.82 782 1.2 20.7 6.9
2 Sahakar nagar 28.3 8.2 1240 186 56.11 17.3 214.82 778 1.7 27.94 5.3
3 Kandari 26.3 7.8 970 162 88.97 21.4 220.1 874 0.8 28.82 4.1
4 New RMS colony 27.3 8.1 1090 152 90.58 10.8 144.02 776 1.8 11.9 18.5
5 Timber market 23.4 7.7 2000 192 58.51 35.2 237.24 862 2.5 25.96 20.4
6 Swami samratha 27.4 7.8 1600 190 84.16 49 234.3 779 4.8 24.86 12.1
7 Anand nagar 27.6 7.6 1450 144 91.38 21 174.66 768 3.2 23.1 5.2
8 Kazi plot 26.9 7.9 1270 132 48.89 45 284 971 2.8 27.06 4.8
9 V.M. ward 26.1 7.5 560 176 63.32 31.2 120.7 1071 2.2 20.46 3.3
10 Mohit nagar 26.3 7.98 1020 106 89.77 9.8 146.26 774 2.4 16.94 7.2
11 WHO Standards 7.5     75 50 250 600      
12 Indian Standards 7-8.5 500 300 75 50 250 750   6  

Except pH, temperature and conductivity all the parameters are expressed in mg/lit

Results and Discussion

The values of different parameters with respect to sampling stations are given in Table -1. The temperature of water was between 23.4 °C to 28.3 °C. The WHO (1992) didnhot recommend any definite temperature for drinking water. PH value varied between 7.5 to 8.2 as compared to the values of ISI standard. At all sampling stations PH was alkaline while at Sahakar nagar and New RMS colony it was near the highest level. Except V.M. Ward. PH values at all other stations were above WHO (1992) standards and thus water is slightly alkaline.

The total dissolved solids were with in the range of 560 to 2000mg/lit. Except the TDS at V.M. Ward (560), in all samples TDS values were high which is an indication of leading of soluable solids from soil and weathing or rocks (Jhingran, 1988) or due to percolation of water having dissolved solid contents.

The total hardness of water a different sampling stations was with in the range of 106 to 192 mg/lit. The levels of hardness are much below the levels (300mg/lit) as laid down by Indian standards and thus the water is soft. The hardness is mainly due to dissolved salts of calcium and magnesium. The comparative values of calcium wre between 48.89 mg/lit to 91.38 mg/lit which were slightly higher than the standard values laid down to WHO (1992) and Indian standards. While the magnesium values ranged between 9.8 to 45mg/lit and at most place values are much lower than the WHO and Indian standards. This range of hardness normally do not have adverse effect on human health. The hardness values above 200mg/lit may cause scale deposition in water distribution system more soap consumption (Trivedi and Goel,1986). The present resluts are comparable to those of Balkrishan and Karuppusmu (2005).

The chloride contents of water was beyond the ISI limit at kazi plot but at all other places are within the prescribed limit (250mg/lit). However, at many places, the chloride contents were near the higher limit. The findings are comparable to the results of Satyanarayan (1992) and Subhadra et al., (2003).

The conductivity of water at various sampling stations ranged between 600to 1071µ mho/cm and all the stations it was higher than the prescribed limit of WHO (600µ mho/cm) and ISI (750µ mho/cm). It indicates the higher amount of ions in the water that can be due to percolation of sewage water (Thomas et al., 2000) or solubility of salts from rocks.

The DO values of water varied between 0.8 to 4.8 mg/lit. The values were quite low which indicates the possibility of persence of microorgansims in the water. It contrast CO
2 values which lies between 11.9 to 28.82 mg/lit are very high. Both aspects indicates that the organisms in water are more. The DO and CO2 values may not play important role in drinking water however, higher CO2 levels makes the water acidic (Jha and Verma 2000). However, though the CO2 levels are high. the PHof water was alkaline. The COD values of water were in the range of 3.3 to 20.4 at different locations. The values of COD were very high at New RMS colony and Timber market indicates the percolaton of sewage waterin the underground water.

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Dr. S.P. Zambare, Reader, Department of Zoology. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, Marathwada University, Aurangabad for kind cooperation and valuable guidance during investigation of water analysis.

References
 

  1. APHA - Standard method for the examination of water and wastewater 16th edition, Washington D.C (1992).
  2. Bolenback W.M. Ground water and wells Johnson Division UOP Inc. Minnesota. (1983).
  3. Balkrishan V and Karwppusany S. Physico-chemical characteristics of drinking water samples of palani Tamilnadu. J. Ecotoxicol Environ Monit (2005) 15(3) : 235-238.
  4. Indian Standard methods of sampling and test (physical and chemical) for water used in industry Indian standards Institution New Delhi IS 3025 (1964).
  5. ISI Indian Standard specification for drinking water ISI 10500, (1983).
  6. Jhingran V.G Fish and fisheries of India Hindustan publishing cooperation (India) (1998) Delhi 666.
  7. Jha A.N and Verma P.K. Physico - chemical properties of drinking water in town area in Godda district under Santal Pargana in (Bihar) India poss Res (2000) 19(2): 245- 247.
  8. Kataria H.C Preminay study of drinking wate of Pipariya town ship. Poll Res. (2000) 19(4): 645-649.
  9. Kataria H.C An evalutiaon of water qualtiy of Kaliasot river. Ind Environ prot. (1994) 14(9): 690-694
  10. Ranjit Kumar N. Singh p and Singh, R.P water resources in Inda Need for holistic development and caution exploiation Ind J.Agri,Ecol., (2005) 58(3): 448-466.
  11. Satyanarayan M.V Ground water quality of machilipatnam and total dissolved solids prediction through condcutivity measurements. Poll Res., (1992) 11(4): 203-209
  12. Shiklomanov, I.A. Appraisal and assessment of world water resources IWRA. Water Int., (2000) 25(1): 11-32.
  13. Subhadra, D.G., Barbuddhe, S.B., Hazel, D. and Dolly, S. Physico-chemical characteristics of drinking water of Velsaw, Goa. J. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Monit., (2003) 13(3): 203-209.
  14. Thomas, S., Sandhya, C., Nair, R. Murugan, Drinking water quality status in Kottarakara area. Kollam district. Kerala. Indian J. Environ and Ecopln., (2000) 3(1): 143-145.
  15. Trivedy, R.D. and Goel, P.K. Chemical and biological methods for water pollution studies. Enc. Publications Karad, (1986) 215.
  16. WHO. Environmental Health criteria, 5, World Health Organisation, Geneva (1992).